Skip to content

Employee Health Coverage Rules by Country: 45-Country Comparison

For US employers with staff abroad, or planning a first hire outside the US, this page sets 45 countries side by side in four regional tables. Each row shows how health cover works for a local employee, what the employer pays into, which rules limit insurers and staffing firms, and whether an international plan tops up local cover or can be the main cover. Check the column notes below the tables before relying on a single cell, then open the country guide for the detail.

Get a quote

Latin America and Canada

All eight countries here run a public or mandatory scheme that a local employee joins first, and Canada sits with its neighbours in the Americas. The Latin America guide goes deeper on the region.

Latin America and Canada: health rules for a local employee
CountryPublic or mandatory schemeEmployer pays in?Foreign insurers restricted?EOR or staffing limits?International plan role
ArgentinaObras socialesYesYesNot clearTop-up
BrazilSUS (tax-funded)NoYesNot clearTop-up
CanadaProvincial and territorial plansVariesNot clearNot clearTop-up
ChileFonasa or an IsapreNoYesYesTop-up
ColombiaSGSSS, through an EPSVariesYesYesTop-up
Costa RicaCCSS health insuranceYesNot clearNot clearTop-up
MexicoIMSSYesYesYesTop-up
PeruEsSaludYesYesYesTop-up

In plain terms: a global plan is extra cover in every one of these countries, and six of the eight limit who can sell insurance locally. Mexico, Colombia, Chile and Peru also regulate staffing, which shapes how an employer of record can be used.

Europe

Europe mixes tax-funded health services, social insurance paid through payroll, and individually bought basic policies. The Europe guide compares those models side by side.

Europe: health rules for a local employee
CountryPublic or mandatory schemeEmployer pays in?Foreign insurers restricted?EOR or staffing limits?International plan role
BelgiumCompulsory insurance through a health fundYesNot clearYesTop-up
DenmarkTax-funded public careNoNot clearNot clearTop-up
FranceAssurance Maladie and the company mutuelleYesNot clearNot clearTop-up
GermanyStatutory health insuranceYesNot clearYesTop-up
IrelandHSE public servicesNoYesNot clearTop-up
ItalySSN (tax-funded)NoYesYesTop-up
NetherlandsStandard insurance (Zvw)YesNot clearYesTop-up
PolandNFZNoYesYesTop-up
PortugalSNSNoNot clearNot clearTop-up
RomaniaCNAS social health insuranceNot clearYesYesTop-up
SpainSNSNoVariesYesTop-up
SwedenRegional public careNoYesNot clearTop-up
SwitzerlandBasic insurance (KVG/LAMal)NoYesYesTop-up
UkraineProgramme of Medical GuaranteesNoYesNot clearTop-up
United KingdomNHSNoYesNot clearTop-up

The local system always comes first in Europe, so a global plan works as a top-up across all fifteen countries. The sharper divide is staffing law: eight countries license, register, time-limit or ban the supply of workers, while the employer clearly pays toward the health scheme itself in just four: Belgium, France, Germany and the Netherlands.

Asia-Pacific

This region has the widest spread, from the payroll-based insurance of Japan and South Korea to Hong Kong, where no health insurance scheme exists. See the Asia-Pacific guide for how the fifteen countries compare.

Asia-Pacific: health rules for a local employee
CountryPublic or mandatory schemeEmployer pays in?Foreign insurers restricted?EOR or staffing limits?International plan role
AustraliaMedicareNoNot clearNot clearTop-up
ChinaEmployee basic medical insuranceYesYesYesTop-up
Hong KongNo insurance scheme (Hospital Authority care)NoYesNot clearMain cover possible
IndiaESIVariesYesNot clearMain cover possible
IndonesiaJKN (BPJS Kesehatan)YesYesNot clearTop-up
JapanEmployees' Health InsuranceYesYesNot clearTop-up
MalaysiaNo national health insurance (public MOH care)NoYesNot clearMain cover possible
New ZealandTax-funded public systemNoYesNot clearMain cover possible
PakistanProvincial employees' social securityYesNot clearNot clearTop-up
PhilippinesPhilHealthNot clearYesNot clearTop-up
SingaporeMediShield Life (citizens and PRs)VariesYesYesMain cover possible
South KoreaNational Health InsuranceYesYesNot clearTop-up
TaiwanNational Health InsuranceYesYesNot clearTop-up
ThailandSocial Security FundYesYesNot clearTop-up
VietnamNational health insuranceYesYesNot clearTop-up

Most countries in this table make the employer pay into a national scheme, so a global plan normally tops it up, and nearly all of them license insurers tightly. Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Singapore and New Zealand are the exceptions where it can be the main cover, in several of them only for employees with a certain pay level, work pass or visa.

Middle East and Africa

Rules in this group range from the UAE’s employer-bought policies to South Africa’s voluntary medical schemes. The Middle East and Africa guide covers all seven countries in more detail.

Middle East and Africa: health rules for a local employee
CountryPublic or mandatory schemeEmployer pays in?Foreign insurers restricted?EOR or staffing limits?International plan role
EgyptUniversal health insurance (being phased in)YesYesNot clearTop-up
IsraelNational health insurance through a health fundVariesNot clearYesTop-up
KenyaSHA and SHIFNot clearYesNot clearTop-up
NigeriaNHIA health insuranceVariesYesNot clearTop-up
South AfricaNo compulsory scheme; medical schemes are voluntaryNoNot clearNot clearMain cover possible
TurkeyGeneral health insurance (GSS)YesYesNot clearTop-up
United Arab EmiratesEmployer-bought private coverYesYesNot clearTop-up

Five of these seven countries restrict who can sell insurance, and most attach cover to a statutory scheme or a residence permit, so a global plan usually sits on top. South Africa stands apart: with no compulsory scheme, an international plan can take the place of a voluntary local one.

How to read the table

Each row condenses one country guide, and every country name links to that guide. Read the columns this way:

  • Public or mandatory scheme is the short name of the public system or compulsory cover a local employee belongs to.
  • Employer pays in? Yes means the employer pays its own share, levy or premium toward that scheme, or must buy the required cover. No means the scheme runs on taxes or on the employee’s own contribution, even when the employer deducts that contribution from pay. Varies means the answer turns on the province, the employee’s pay or work pass, or the employer’s size.
  • Foreign insurers restricted? Yes means local law requires a licence or authorisation to sell or carry on insurance there. It does not always stop an employee holding a plan bought abroad: Chile, Peru and India, for example, let residents buy cover abroad while unlicensed insurers still cannot sell locally. Spain shows Varies because its limit applies to cover offered for certain visas.
  • EOR or staffing limits? Yes means the country licenses, registers, time-limits or bans the supply of workers to another business, or limits what an employer of record may do. Whether a given EOR arrangement falls inside those rules is a question for the provider.
  • International plan role shows Top-up where a statutory scheme or a residence-based public health service is the employee’s base cover, so a global plan adds to it. Main cover possible marks countries where, for some or all employees, no compulsory scheme or full residence-based entitlement applies, so a private or international plan can be their main health cover.

Not clear marks a rule that is unsettled or not set out plainly in official guidance. The tables are a starting map, not legal or tax advice, so confirm the rules for your own hire with a local adviser in that country.

Patterns across regions

An international plan replaces the local scheme in very few places: it is a top-up in 39 of the 45 countries and can be the main cover in only six. Limits on who can sell insurance are the norm, not the exception, and they are most consistent across Asia-Pacific and Latin America. Staffing rules cluster in continental Europe and parts of Latin America, which is where choosing between an employer of record and your own entity needs the most care. Employers pay toward health most often where the scheme runs as social insurance, as in Germany, Japan and Mexico, and least often where care is funded from taxes, as in the UK, Denmark and Australia.

Requesting an introduction for a team in several countries

Mithril1 does not sell health plans. When the table has helped you narrow things down, list the countries your people live in, how many work in each, and whether they are on your own payroll, with an employer of record or on contracts. Send that through the quote form on this page and we will hand it to a benefits partner that works on international and remote-team health cover. From there, the partner and the insurer decide who is eligible, which plans are available and how they are priced.

Your US business insurance is a separate conversation. For workers’ compensation or employment practices liability covering a distributed team, we request quotes from insurers, and the insurer decides after reviewing your details.

A few useful answers

Common questions

Why do most countries show Top-up in the last column?

Because most countries tie health cover to residence or employment by law. Where a statutory scheme or a public system already covers the employee, a global plan cannot stand in for it and can only add care on top, such as private hospitals or cover while travelling.

In which countries can an international plan be the main cover?

Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Singapore, New Zealand and South Africa. In Hong Kong and South Africa no compulsory scheme applies; in India it depends on pay against the ESI ceiling, in Malaysia and Singapore on the Employment Pass (in Singapore, an Employment Pass normally needs your own Singapore entity), and in New Zealand on whether the employee is eligible for public care.

What does Not clear mean in a cell?

It means the rule is unsettled or isn’t set out plainly in official guidance, so the table doesn’t give a yes or no. The linked country guide explains what is known.

Does a Yes for staffing limits mean an employer of record cannot be used?

Not necessarily, but it means the arrangement needs checking. These countries license, register, time-limit or ban the supply of workers, and in some, such as Spain and Switzerland, the usual employer of record model has to fit those rules or use a locally licensed provider. The country guide sets out what each country requires.

How do I get help covering a team spread across several countries?

Use the quote form on this page to tell us where each person lives, how many people are in each country and how they are hired. We will pass it to a benefits partner for international and remote-team cover; eligibility, plan options and pricing then sit with that partner and the insurer.